Asking vets to return bonuses is outrageous

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

Can you believe the Pentagon is telling as many as 10,000 California National Guard members that they have to give back signing bonuses they got 10 years ago for re-enlisting during a war?

Can you believe the Pentagon is telling as many as 10,000 California National Guard members that they have to give back signing bonuses they got 10 years ago for re-enlisting during a war?

No way. When Congress returns, it needs to drop the bickering du jour and do this one thing even Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump agree on: Waive that order. It’s just wrong.

An audit turned up some $22 million given out erroneously as incentives during the recruiting frenzy a decade ago when it was clear the Iraq war wasn’t ending.

The money was supposed to be used to retain National Guard members in certain specialties, but it was offered more widely, and the paperwork was doctored. A recruiter was sentenced to 30 years in prison for this.

Tax dollars paid improperly should be recovered in most cases. But these people based life and death decisions on this money, often about $15,000. It was a college fund for a child, or the last stretch of savings needed to buy a home. Hard to turn down, even at the risk of getting blown up in the desert.

The Pentagon can’t refund the time soldiers spent in Iraq or Afghanistan because of that bonus. Some came home physically or emotionally scarred; some never came home. They held up their part of the bargain.

California Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein are fighting for the vets. In the House, Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy are of like mind. Let’s do this.

— The Mercury News